IT’S BIBLICAL SHOWTIME!
by
Gary DeVaney
Debaters! Let’s All Get Ready To Rumble!
So, do you like to debate?
Do you play trivia?
This site contains a plethora
of controversial Bible questions and facts that believers tend to find feisty and irritating.
Can YOU handle it?
Some realists, who question, value realistic facts and knowledge over nonsensical faith
and belief. Most believers do not question their own beliefs, ergo, they don't value knowledge over faith. Do you know just
one Christian who proves to be a realist? Does he or she believe in "The Virgin Birth" and "The Resurrection"? How realistic
does he or she prove to be?
Many authoritative and argumentative believers value control over content. Some believers tend
to re-invent themselves by "blessing" (ordaining) themselves into a state of Godliness; thus, they assume power and authority
over others.
Some set their divine authority over power, logic and reason.
Many "beliefs" (pretend to know) are based upon "tradition" (the dead leading
the blind), ignorance, superstition, ego and imperialistic arrogance.
If you do enjoy debating,
try debating these selected Biblical Chapters and Verses (C&Vs)!
Declaration: I did not
write the Bible! I am not responsible for what the Bible says. I'm not responsible for how people feel about
what the Bible says.
I read the entire Bible and
did an intense book report! This work is a report on the character and deeds of Jesus and God as written about, chapter
and verse, in the Bible.
Some have said that if one
knew these selected passages, one would know more Biblical controversy than 90% of existing clergy.
Logic and reason is focused upon
in the pursuit of the facts.
It takes some intelligence to
understand, and patience to endure the language and writings of the Bible. Most of all, it takes bold courage to judge
what the writings mean. Without judgment, one cannot make decisions.
Is one capable of or willing
to find out the raw facts about the Biblical God, as written in His Own diary, Chapter and Verse (C&V)?
Here is a question that started
it all: Why does mankind treat almost every living thing so poorly? This research trims down the examination to two basic
contributions.
1: The Biblical God-model and God's
C&V Bible.
2: The ever-evolving genetic contributions
of biological man.
Don’t most concepts of God
parallel human egos? The main motivation to conduct this investigative research is the attempt to understand why mankind behaves
the way mankind does.
Is Jesus Christ of
the New Testament (NT) and / or the God-model of the Old Testament (OT) responsible for how human
beings treat each other?
We
have all been preached Biblical “truth” all our lives. Most of that “truth” has been told to
us as hearsay by mind-set Clergy and other authoritative believers.
This
investigation is about written Biblical facts, Chapter and Verse.
Epicurus, who lived 342-271 B.C.E., logically did away with the gods when he wrote these words:
"Either
God wishes to destroy evil and can not or God can destroy evil but will
not or God neither wishes, nor has the power or
God both desires and is able. If God wishes and can not, God is impotent. If God can but will not, God is wicked. If God neither
wishes, nor can, God is impotent as well as wicked. If God can and will, why does
evil exist?"
GWD:
As long as God won't - God can't.
Dr.
Paul Winchell’s book: God 2000, Religion Without the Bible brought my attention to selected controversial
and contradictory Biblical passages. Paul's bold findings helped launch this investigation in 1982. Paul also
obtained a patent on a mechanical-heart and was a famous ventriloquist on television in the 1950s. This documentation includes
many of Paul’s influences.
C.
Dennis McKinsey's two (2) books:
The
Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy 1995 by Prometheus Books
Biblical
Errancy, A Reference Guide 2000 by Prometheus Books
These
two books are the greatest authorities found to date that expose Biblical C&V contradictions and errors.
I
was once asked how I compared my work with C. Dennis McKinsey?
If
you want to be a High School graduate of Biblical controversy, read my stuff. If you want to become equivalent to a PHD in
Biblical contradiction and controversy, read C. Dennis McKinsey.
Visit
C. Dennis McKinsey's above website link.
Could
our human behavior be attributed by how we perceive The Biblical God, that we were taught, created us?
Selected
sources were three Bibles for this investigation:
The
King James Version
The
New American Catholic (Easy-English) Bible
The Jewish
Torah. This book opens back to front. Its text on the right page is in Hebrew. The text on the left page is in English.
Otherwise, this Torah has Chapters and Verses just like the Catholic and KJV Bibles.
Investigated
are the characteristics, deeds, scenarios, and the attitudes of The God the three Bibles as they are depicted Chapter
and Verse. (C&V)
Declaration of Responsibility: These works are paraphrased from these three (3) Bibles. The temperament and the editing
is mostly mine. I am Gary DeVaney
Note:
This is a work of concentrated facts for study, reference - and entertainment.
"Intelligence is categorical":
One can be brilliant in one categorical and a moron in another. Although I personally view myself to be a moron in many categories,
the Bible is not one of them.
A test of intelligence is the
capacity to deal with here and now reality. Belief has little concern for here and now reality.
Religions are magic shows. Religion
force-feeds faith and belief which disables the believer from focusing on reality. Governments use these religions to
establish the habits of believing, obeying, supporting and sacrificing for a current "assumed" authority. The assumed authority
that receives the benefit of fear-based religions is the ever-evolving government itself.
Thought
is the most powerful force in the universe. The question is the highest form of thought. Always question authority - and then question
authority's answers. Let’s use thought to assist mankind. GWD
What one
person, who you know, would be impacted if sent to this site?
Any corrections, feedback or comments?